VLT = 40 | TSER = 50 … SunTek CarbonXP 45 VLT = 33 | TSER = 53 … SunTek CarbonXP 35 VLT = 16 | TSER = 56 … SunTek CarbonXP 18 VLT = 70 | TSER = 49 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 70 VLT = 51 | TSER = 51 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 50 VLT = 46 | TSER = 52 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 46 VLT = 42 | TSER = 53 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 42 VLT = 38 | TSER = 56 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 38 VLT = 32 | TSER = 58 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 30 VLT = 18 | TSER = 62 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 20 VLT = 04 | TSER = 66 … Global QDP Ceramic Charcoal 05 VLT = 54 | TSER = 49 … Formula One Pinnacle 50 VLT = 43 | TSER = 53 … Formula One Pinnacle 40 VLT = 33 | TSER = 57 … Formula One Pinnacle 30 VLT = 18 | TSER = 61 … Formula One Pinnacle 15 VLT = 05 | TSER = 65 … Formula One Pinnacle 05 VLT = 71 | TSER = 48 … Huper Optik Ceramic 70 VLT = 60 | TSER = 43 … Huper Optik Ceramic 60 VLT = 52 | TSER = 50 … Huper Optik Ceramic 50 VLT = 40 | TSER = 55 … Huper Optik Ceramic 40 VLT = 34 | TSER = 61 … Huper Optik Ceramic 35 VLT = 30 | TSER = 63 … Huper Optik Ceramic 30 VLT = 21 | TSER = 68 … Huper Optik Ceramic 20 VLT = 15 | TSER = 73 … Huper Optik Ceramic 15
VLT = 06 | TSER = 75 … Huper Optik Ceramic 05 VLT = 75 | TSER = 58 … TSER = Spectra Photosync SPH75 VLT = 66 | TSER = 64 … TSER = Spectra Photosync SPH65 VLT = 55 | TSER = 67 … TSER = Spectra Photosync SPH55 VLT = 44 | TSER = 71 … TSER = Spectra Photosync SPH45 VLT = 32 | TSER = 79 … TSER = Spectra Photosync SPH35 Ranking determined by comparing TSER (Total Solar Energy Rejection) to VLT (Visible Light Transmitted). Sorted in descending order, with most effective heat reduction technology at top. Would appreciate help sifting through these three choices, (Huper, Crystalline, PhotoSync) help me sort fact from fiction Another video shows a guy using a scratchy pad on both Huper and Cyrstalline, but is he applying even pressure to both? Seems like the results could be easily manipulated if one were so inclined. One video is comparing 3M Prestige to Huper, which is apples to oranges because Prestige is for residential windows. But they are so poorly executed, that the whole premise seems questionable. There are a few YouTube videos which attempt to demonstrate the durability of Huper. But when I bring that same skepticism to the idea that Huper Optic is more durable, I can't seem to find much convincing evidence for that idea either. I'm just your average Joe Consumer and happy to view any product with a skeptical eye. Regarding Those Huper "Durability" Videos The underlying "'light adaptive" technology is of minimal value to begin with, reacts slowly, and might only last 5 years or so. The superior TSER digits (see list below) are not believable, and or not independently verified.Ģ.
#Model 3 photosync 75 pro
Seems there are a few pro installers that are not big fans of 3M Crystalline and Spectra PhotoSync, or at least will voice a preference for Huper. I've been researching the purchase of window tinting for my new car.
0 kommentar(er)
